FINDINGS OF THE INVESTIGATION INTO CHINA’S ACTS, POLICIES, AND PRACTICES RELATED TO TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, AND INNOVATION UNDER SECTION 301 OF THE TRADE ACT OF 1974
Gavin Law Offices, which handles intellectual property matters for clients, earlier this month opened an outpost in Raleigh, North Carolina, after picking up attorney Alan Etkin. It’s the firm’s first office outside of Virginia.
Founder Pam Gavin said the expansion is similar to its January push into Charlottesville when longtime solo attorney Elva Mason Holland joined the fold.
“This is very much a similar story,” Gavin said of Etkin.
Etkin, who earned his law degree from Emory University, handles a variety of business law issues for closely held corporations.
“Alan and I worked together for years. He was in house with a big client,” Gavin said. “The company he was with was sold and he was doing his own thing and I said, ‘Why don’t we tackle this together?’”
Gavin also liked the idea of having an office in Raleigh to tap into that area’s concentration of tech firms and startups, a ripe environment for the firm’s bread-and-butter IP practice.
“It’s a great market for tech and intellectual property,” she said.
The firm, founded about 15 years ago after Gavin’s stints at McGuireWoods and Reed Smith, now has an attorney headcount of seven.
Gavin said she’ll keep her eye out for future growth through similar deals with attorneys.
“I’m always plotting and planning,” she said. “I’m just going to continue to grow.”
Click here for the full article on Richmond BizSense
A Richmond law firm that boasts clients in the entertainment industry has expanded its practice westward.
Gavin Law Office, which was founded locally in 2002, last month opened an office in Charlottesville.
The expansion was prompted by the addition of Elva Mason Holland, a Charlottesville attorney who had a longtime solo practice before joining Gavin.
Firm founder Pam Gavin said she’s had her eye on Holland for years.
“I’ve been trying to get her to work with me forever,” Gavin said. “She’s been solo. She needs more depth to the bench and I’m always interested in growing.”
Gavin said her firm’s practice and Holland’s book of business fit nicely together. Gavin Law represents musicians and a range of businesses, from startups up to large companies, in intellectual property matters. Holland represents talent in the entertainment business.
The new addition brings Gavin’s attorney headcount to six. Its local office is in Henrico County at 2229 Pump Road.
Holland has her bachelor’s and law degrees from UVA.
Gavin, also a UVA grad, began her career in bank marketing, before going back to law school at William & Mary. She started her own firm in 2004 after stints at McGuireWoods and Reed Smith.
Gavin has expanded the firm previously, including by adding a solo practioner in Bedford years back, before that attorney in that office decided to go back out on his own. She said this latest stop in Charlottesville won’t be the firm’s last.
“I’m always planning and plotting,” she said. “Continued expansion is on the horizon.”
Click here to read the full story in Richmond BizSense
Gavin Law Offices is pleased to announce, Pamela Gavin has been recognized for the eighth time in the Virginia Business Magazine among Virginia’s Legal Elite for 2017. Each year, the honor of Virginia Legal Elite recognizes the top Virginia lawyers as voted by their peers and in cooperation with the Virginia Bar Association.
This is truly an honor!
The Consumer Review Fairness Act (the “Act”) became effective in March 2017 and has significant implications for most companies offering consumer products or services, especially for those with interactive websites. The Act limits what companies can include in their standard contracts, including the terms and conditions of some websites. Beginning on December 14, 2017, the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) and state attorneys general will treat the use of contracts violating the Act as an unfair and deceptive trade practice, making it subject to potential financial penalties or other enforcement.
What Does the Act Do?
The definitions included in the Act are fairly technical, but in short, the Act protects consumer reviews of products and services when a purchase is made under a non-negotiated form contract. To accomplish this, the Act prohibits the use of “form contracts” lacking meaningful negotiation and containing terms that (i) prohibit or restrict reviews of the seller’s products/services, (ii) impose a penalty or fee for such reviews, or (iii) transfer certain intellectual property rights in reviews. The Act also voids the provisions of any “form contracts” that do any of the foregoing. However, the contracts can still prohibit the posting of certain content, such as trade secrets, confidential information, certain personal information, offensive language, and computer viruses, to name a few.
What Does the Act Apply to?
Does the Act Prohibit Deletion of Social Media Posts or Other Reviews?
The Act never actually states that it is unlawful to remove reviews, but rather that it is unlawful to have “form contracts” restricting reviews in the manner described. However, the FTC states on its website that the Act applies to social media (at www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/consumer-review-fairness-act-what-businesses-need-know). The terms described in the Act do clearly seem to include posts on social media accounts. Still, because there is no blanket restriction in the Act from removing reviews, the Act seems only to prevent companies from including terms in their “form contracts” that limit social media posts (or any other reviews described in the Act). None of this seems to limit a company’s ability to actually delete social media posts, so long as none of the company’s “form contracts” restrict or prohibit covered communications. However, it should be noted that the FTC may attempt to enforce this Act broadly, and courts have not yet had significant opportunity to interpret its reach.
- The Act covers any oral, written, or pictorial review, whether electronic or not. This includes more than just online reviews, although online reviews are likely to be the main area the Act will be applied.
- “Form contracts” can still transfer some intellectual property rights in reviews, so long as they meet the requirements of the Act.
- The Act does not limit a business from bringing claims of defamation, libel, or slander over a review.
How Do I Comply with the Act?
- All contracts with consumers that are (for all practical purposes) non-negotiable should be reviewed and revised for compliance with the Act. This includes most electronic contracts, such as e-commerce contracts, and paper contracts that are standard forms, such as pre-printed contracts used in over-the-counter sales or rentals.
- Although it seems unclear at this point whether deleting negative social media posts could bring on an FTC enforcement action, the best practice would be to not delete any negative posts or reviews made by customers unless they are clearly false, misleading, or meet one of the other specifically permissible reasons. Although the Act does not specifically prohibit this, the FTC may view it as within the scope of the Act and may pursue such activity. Even if you are ultimately successful in defending a challenge, that could be a costly and embarrassing fight.
- To ensure best practices, you may consider developing an internal policy that meets these standards.
Contact us for more information on the Act or to get specific advice on how to comply. — Collin Atkins